Talk:Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Smooth corner

In the first paragraph:

'In case of a smooth corner, these waves can be extended backwards to meet at a point'

Is this - '(all) waves . . . meet at a POINT' - always true? (I don't think it is: indeed, I'm reasonably certain that it is not). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.22.87 (talk) 22:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was corrected in the October 2014 edits, but for anyone wondering, this is only true for circular corners. 209.87.255.222 (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Impossibility of expanding a flow through a single "shock" wave

In the image of an "expansion process through a single shock" shouldn't the w1 and w2 be perpendicular to the shock? --Joao30121998 (talk) 04:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205180438/http://meweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~meapplet/java/comp_calculator/expansionfan_calculator.html to http://meweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~meapplet/java/comp_calculator/expansionfan_calculator.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this is a real physical thing that happens, so how can it have infinite parts?

We say that the Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan

consists of an infinite number of Mach waves...

and we use "infinite" a few other times. But other articles, such as Mach wave itself, use the term as if it's a real thing, and correct me if I'm wrong, but can real things have infinite elements, I would not think so? At Supersonic we have a picture with the caption

U.S. Navy F/A-18 approaching the sound barrier. The white cloud forms as a result of the supersonic expansion fans dropping the air temperature below the dew point.

Would it not take infinite time for the cloud to form if it's being caused by an infinite number of waves? All this is way above my pay grade, but I was confused, so if I am right, shouldn't we clarify that the term "Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan" is use for both a mathematical concept and a real thing that occurs sometimes when planess fly? Just saying. Herostratus (talk) 04:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]