This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I am very confused by this article. The first paragraph explains that Charles V split the Habsburg lands between Phillip II and Ferdinand I. The second paragraph then immediately says "A succession crisis was clearly looming", refers to the upcoming death of Charles II, and talks about the "union of French and Spanish dominions".
Oh, OK. Looking at the article history I see that a paragraph explaining this was deleted by a vandal. I have restored the paragraph. Molinari18:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are we sure that Frederick I of Prussia was involved with the Pragmatic Sanction, rather than Frederick William? Given that Frederick I died in February 1713 while the Charles only announced the edict in April 1713. 2404:8000:1002:B3A9:A5C7:33C0:F8CF:D7AB (talk) 23:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]