Talk:Power rating

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Power rating article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electronics High‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unnamed section

There is another kind of power rating, one that measure strength of sport teams in statistics.

Power Rating Main Definition

The main definition for the Power Rating indicated here equals it with the 'dissipated' power outputing a device. This is only correct for 'dissipative' devices, which immediately restrict the 'general' definition at the same moment.

The Power Rating of a device -being it dissipative or not- is the 'Maximum Input Power Allowed to flowing into a device'. The main definition here only helds for dissipative devices, which is not general. After that, this 'narrow' definition is 'widen' by including the 'efficiency' parameter, then mixing both dissipative and non-dissipative devices, hence confusing both kind of devices.

The definition also works when there is a primary efficiency, for fixing the definition. If there is not 'dissipation' nor 'mechanical' outputs -such as conversion to other energies part of the base purpose of the device-

Hence a 10kW laser could have a 1kW dissipating power and a 9kW LED output power a 10kW heating reactor could have 9kW heat power and 1kW for auxiliar systems, and a 10kW motor could have a 1kW dissipation and a 9kW transferred mechanical power. Clearly the dissipation, which is relevant, is not the key aspect here.

This should be corrected as soon as possible, whatever the time this definition has been lasted here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypfco (talk • contribs) 06:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Power rating. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130903020047/http://ieso.ca/imoweb/marketdata/genDisclosure.asp to http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/marketdata/genDisclosure.asp
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dma.dk/sw22623.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]