Talk:Power Girl/Archive 2
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Power Girl. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Popular Culture
I tried adding the following image and text. I really don't feel like edit warring about this.
References
What do you think? --evrik (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Those sources either aren't considered reliable by Wikipedia standards or don't say anything like what you're citing them for. See WP:IRS, particularly WP:UGC, and see WP:VERIFY. If you can cite a reliable source that says the above, then there's no problem (WP:CHALLENGE). DonQuixote (talk) 03:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Even if verified the blanket statement still reeks of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, merely being popular isn't enough. There are lots of popular cosplay characters.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not so, it speaks to the popularity of the character. --evrik (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- It would if sources reflected this, but the sources you gave don't really show that. - Aoidh (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Agree. The sources could at most be used to reference something like "Like many well-known superheroines, Power Girl is a popular cosplay character", which really just devolves "Many superheroines are popular cosplay characters" which isn't really useful info for this article. If you had a character of whom you could say "Despite her relative obscurity otherwise, so-and-so is a popular cosplay character" that might be worthwhile information. Herostratus (talk) 13:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- "Despite her relative obscurity otherwise, so-and-so is a popular cosplay character" I like it, but then someone will claim she's not obscure. In any case, I think the relationship to cosplay does deserve some mention. --evrik (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you can cite a reliable source that says that, then go right ahead. DonQuixote (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- "Despite her relative obscurity otherwise, so-and-so is a popular cosplay character" I like it, but then someone will claim she's not obscure. In any case, I think the relationship to cosplay does deserve some mention. --evrik (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Agree. The sources could at most be used to reference something like "Like many well-known superheroines, Power Girl is a popular cosplay character", which really just devolves "Many superheroines are popular cosplay characters" which isn't really useful info for this article. If you had a character of whom you could say "Despite her relative obscurity otherwise, so-and-so is a popular cosplay character" that might be worthwhile information. Herostratus (talk) 13:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- It would if sources reflected this, but the sources you gave don't really show that. - Aoidh (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not so, it speaks to the popularity of the character. --evrik (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Even if verified the blanket statement still reeks of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, merely being popular isn't enough. There are lots of popular cosplay characters.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- How about, "The design of the character's costume has made her a favorite in cosplay?" [1] --evrik (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm hearing no objection to the text above. --evrik (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Er...you should read the responses. You would need to cite a reliable source, to begin with. Two others have said it's not notable for inclusion. DonQuixote (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- No one objected to the text from 12-27-2014. --evrik (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- You would still need to cite a reliable source. That requirement doesn't change. DonQuixote (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- No one objected to the text from 12-27-2014. --evrik (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Er...you should read the responses. You would need to cite a reliable source, to begin with. Two others have said it's not notable for inclusion. DonQuixote (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm hearing no objection to the text above. --evrik (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Text aside. There is no reason the image can't be placed on the article. --evrik (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Images carry a lot of WP:WEIGHT, and with out the text there is no reason to give it any.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is pretty clear that the character is used in cosplay, and I would say makes her more popular than the comic book ever was. The images is relevant under popular culture. --evrik (talk) 21:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Again, you need reliable sources to back up those assertions, otherwise its WP:OR.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Any of those could be a reliable source for the one sentence. --evrik (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- As DonQuixote pointed out two years ago, either they are unreliable or do not verify the information that you are claiming. This discussion should have been closed long ago.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Any of those could be a reliable source for the one sentence. --evrik (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Again, you need reliable sources to back up those assertions, otherwise its WP:OR.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is pretty clear that the character is used in cosplay, and I would say makes her more popular than the comic book ever was. The images is relevant under popular culture. --evrik (talk) 21:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Images carry a lot of WP:WEIGHT, and with out the text there is no reason to give it any.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Just coming back to this. I think we should take this to a neutral third party. --evrik (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Third and fourth parties have already weighed in. Concensus is against you, get over it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- You can try, but I have to tell you that the name of the game is Citing Reliable Sources. If you can't start with a direct quote then you're not citing properly. If you're not citing properly then no one's going to support you. DonQuixote (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- The few people who look at this page may be biased. Let's pick another forum. --evrik (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- I went ahead and added it back in with eight references. Trim them if you like, but one or some of them should be enough to make the one sentence stick. --evrik (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Throwing things against the wall and seeing which one sticks isn't the proper way of doing this. As mentioned above, if you can't start with a direct quote, then it's not suitable for an encyclopaedia article. DonQuixote (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are eight references. Pick one. Otherwise stop being difficult. There is more than enough to document one line of text and a photo. --evrik (talk) 01:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you won't cite reliable sources properly (see WP:VERIFY), then you're the one being difficult. And whatever happened to getting a third opinion that you mentioned? If you continue to ignore policy, then you're just being a nuisance and you should drop the stick. DonQuixote (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- There are eight references. Pick one. Otherwise stop being difficult. There is more than enough to document one line of text and a photo. --evrik (talk) 01:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Throwing things against the wall and seeing which one sticks isn't the proper way of doing this. As mentioned above, if you can't start with a direct quote, then it's not suitable for an encyclopaedia article. DonQuixote (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brian Childs (2011-05-11). "The Best of Power Girl Cosplay". uproxx. Retrieved 2016-05-28.
The Power Girl costume is perhaps the most popular cosplay costume of super hero comic books. By that I don't mean that it is the most frequently worn costume. It is the most popular comic book costume for people to re-post, share and click on for reasons that remain a mystery to no one.
--evrik (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)