Talk:Powderhorn Park, Minneapolis

Park/Neighborhood

I was looking for an article on the park itself. The distinction between it and the Powderhorn neighborhood is a bit fuzzy in this article. Morganfitzp (talk) 01:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back 15 years later to propose a split into two articles. I grouped information on the park into one section already. Malvoliox (talk) 16:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think two articles, one for the park and one for the officially designated neighborhood, makes sense. The park itself is a notable park and could be its own article. I think the current title, "Powderhorn Park, Minneapolis", should stay as is for the neighborhood so it sticks with the titles for other Minneapolis neighborhood articles. Perhaps the park article is Powderhorn Park (urban park)? Wikipedia uses urban park as the main article instead of city park or municipal park.

The about template at the top note can help differentiate:

"This article is about the officially designated neighborhood. For the park, see Powdernhorn Park (urban park).
"This article is about the park. For the officially designated neighborhood, see Powderhorn Park, Minneapolis.

Consider also Prospect Park, Minneapolis as it is an official neighborhood and a notable park. Minnemeeples (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to consider including a section for Powderhorn Lake in the new Powderhorn Park (urban park) article. Minnemeeples (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of a situation in Los Angeles where a park and neighborhood share the same name:

Exposition Park (urban park) - the park
Exposition Park, Los Angeles - the neighborhood

Minnemeeples (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Malvoliox (talk) 19:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a new article for the park & moved a lot of content into it. Malvoliox (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Powderhorn Park, Minneapolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]