Talk:Potton

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bedfordshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Complete

Untitled

This about the church.... the history starts in Domesday. See Countess Judith to start a history of this place ... Victuallers 14:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This should be renamed Potton Church, there is nothing about Potton itself.

I agree there is too much about 'Potto Church' for an article about the town of 'Potton' I think there should be a separate article about the church. After al;l there is a lot more to say about potton, for exmaple the old railway line that was stolen away in the 1960s etc. Franny-K 18:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a load of information to this page. So, now that there's barely any information on the Church of St Mary, Potton page, and nobody has stepped forward to write any, is it worth having a separate page at all? I can't see why it shouldn't just be a section on the Potton page. Bogbumper (talk) 07:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potton History Society

I'm sure that members of the society are good and effective contributors to this wiki article, but does the society warrant a large paragraph all about itself in here? Particularly in view of the non-notability of most of the contents of it. Plingsby (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Potton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]