Talk:Potteries derby/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, real life stuff getting in the way, I'll try to get it done on the weekend. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No rush. Echetus Xe 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the need for the mention of Crewe in the opening paragraph?
- Removed.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"said to have been formed in 1876", Said by whom?
- By themselves, have amended.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Vale were complete unknowns", why?
- They were a minor team that hadn't received any coverage before that.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More detail needed about that court case
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"annual Stoke v Vale", vs
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why were Vale forced to reapply?
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It needs to be clarified that the Britannia Stadium and Bet365 Stadium are the same
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"trashed the away end at Vale Park", formalise the language
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Dave Brammer also turned out for Crewe Alexandra after being controversially sold to Crewe", 1, WP:OLINK for Crewe already being linked earlier. And 2, why was it controversial?
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are we mentioning the rivalry with Crewe in the players for both clubs section?
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to highlight in purple if you're removing the Crewe reference above
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OLINK on John Rudge
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source 2, publisher title shouldn't be italicised as its not a print source and shouldn't be a bare web address
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Same as above for all non-print sources
- Think I've done that.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source 36, publisher title needs spacing
- Same for 105
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source 107 needs an access date.
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source 111, needs a proper title and has a bare address as a publisher
- Done.--Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EchetusXe: It looks in pretty good shape. Just need those issues pointed out fixed, then please ping me and I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-Thanks, I've looked at those.@The C of E: --Echetus Xe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Then I am happy to say you have a new GA. Well done @EchetusXe:! The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]