Talk:Potter–Collyer House

Potter–Collyer House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 26, 2015. (Reviewed version).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Potter-Collyer House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 01:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TBH there's not a lot of qualms I have with the article (no plagiarism, made these copy edits) other than the sparsity of the sourcing. Is there anything else out there? Page 706 of this book mentions it, and there's this database listing, but not much else.

WP:NGEO would have this notable (per the second bullet point), but I'd like to see the former two citations incorporated in some way before I pass—if only for reader's sake.

On hold for a fortnight. 23W 05:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: The notability of the article is the fact that the house is on the national register and I did add the citation from the RI.gov website per your request. I did not see the other in The National Register of Historic Places ebook (Collyer Monument shows up), but it is just a database listing that has been wrong before and is an old NRIS type. In this very case, the NRIS date was 1890 and not the original 1863. The house has had a survey done, but the 1980s data was limited to what you essentially see before you now. The fact the house's evolution in design is undetermined goes a long way to showing how unique and how many unknown's exist. It is more sparse than I would like, but out of all the RI papers I checked - I couldn't find any more information - it does not seem to have ever been open for touring like its revolutionary-era counterparts. If I get more information you can bet that I will add it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisGualtieri: That's fine. I just prefer having a multitude of different sources however I can. The one source you added definitely helps. Passing. 23W 23:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]