Talk:Potted meat food product

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Canadian version

The canadian version made by the maple leaf company is a delicacy! It certainly isn't consumed by the very poor. --24.89.237.100 17:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality

This Article lacks... a lot. It doesn't even sound encyclopaedic. "A chore in itself" to read... ok, Maybe we should suggest to read "The Jungle" while we're on the POV here. Time to work on this. 24.196.18.239 20:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to remove the stupid fluff on how it's considered "hick" and "poor" to eat but some vandal bot thinks I'm trying to destroy the article. In all honesty the thread needs to be nuked and redone from the ground up, as when you remove the offensive, offtopic material, the article becomes extremely "stubbish". Sneakernets 23:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sneakernets, thank you for your comments. Your edits may appear to be vandalism when you remove large chunks of text without providing an edit summary. This is a typical vandal behavior and you may easily be mistaken to be one even though you are not one so next time you remove large amounts of data from an article, it would be a good idea to provide an edit summary as to why you have done so. Best, --Kudret abi 23:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Sorry about that, I could have sworn I put an edit summary. :( Sneakernets 23:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, best wishes --Kudret abi 23:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a photo of "SPAM" in the article, but while SPAM is a processed meat, it is not "potted meat food product". Its inclusion in the article falsely implies that Hormel's SPAM is "Beef tripe, mechanically separated chicken [etc.]", which it is not. Hormel does actually make (or perhaps "made" -- I can't find it on their site's current list of products) a "potted meat food product" which contains the ingredients listed in the article, but it's not SPAM, it's the unimaginatively named "Hormel Potted Meat Food Product", which can be seen in various Google searches. Should the SPAM image be removed? -- Ichneumon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can only assume this is a US English use of the term 'potted meat'. In English English (UK English) Potted meat is made by taking a good cut; sealing it with a close fitting led in a pot along with butter and seasoning; then cooking for a long time (3 plus hours) either in water or in a low (140C) oven. The resulting meat & gravy is then minced (ground ?) then placed in a ramikin or similar; and then sealed with a layer of melted butter. Cool in a fridge; eat in 4 to 8 days. Definitely not food for the poor; on the contrary it is quite expensive and therefore (Victorian/Edwardian era) tended to be food for the gentry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.28.112 (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ingredients

I remember buying this once as an impoverished grad student. The list of ingredients was surprising (a lot of organ meats that I didn't even realize were legally useable in food). it would be nice to show a contents label or something in this article, for amusement value if nothing else. DonPMitchell (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling

Recently in the US this product has been been simply labeled 'Potted meat' instead of 'Potted meat food product'. Has there been a change in the labeling rules? Dforest (talk) 07:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Combine with potted meat

These are both tiny little articles about closely related items. They should be combined, especially as few people actually use the term "potted meat food product". 128.151.71.11 (talk) 12:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]