Talk:Potosi (barque)
A fact from Potosi (barque) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 8,022 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Hallo anon, I've nominated the article at Template talk:Did you know. You might want to register an account to get the credit for your work in case it is accepted. -- Matthead Discuß 06:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Name of the ship
[edit]Is the ship named Potosi – no diacritical mark – as it is currently titled, or is it Potosí – with an acute accent over the letter i – as appears in the text? If the latter, the article should be moved. — Bellhalla (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I know no source that uses the diacritic for the ship, it's either Potosi or POTOSI. Many modern day Germans, especially on Wikipedia, have the habit of obediently adopting anything foreign. German Wikipedia has a policy of using Polish and Czech names for places that had German names for centuries, adding the German name in parentheses, marked as German. I guess some eager beavers do not hesitate to apply the modern day spelling of the city for the 19th century German ship, because it should have been named that way, politically correct. -- Matthead Discuß 01:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- The ship name was styled "Potosí" in only a minority of places in the article, so I have removed it, leaving, of course, the references to the town with diacritics intact. I also created a redirect from Potosí (ship) to help cover all bases. — Bellhalla (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Flying P tradition
[edit]The article states that the ship was named beginning with a "P" according to a "tradition". As far as I know, the Potosi was the first in the line of "Flying Ps". Which means that this ship wasn't named as per tradition, but established the tradition. The only book I have available says that Preussen was the second flying P, launched in 1902. That makes Potosi the first.Amandajm (talk) 05:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ignore this. I checked it out. A number of smaller ships began the P line. Amandajm (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Can anyone add an explanation to this article as to what made these ships so successful in rounding the horn? That's arguably the line's biggest 'claim to fame', but it's never really spelled out why there were so effective at doing it in comparison to the hundreds of other ships whose difficulties in rounding the horn made it a notorious ship graveyard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.211.10.234 (talk) 23:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Potosi (barque). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071107103609/http://www.laeisz.de/en/unternehmen/ursprung/1871.html to http://www.laeisz.de/en/unternehmen/ursprung/1871.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608124600/http://www.histarmar.com.ar/Naufragios/6%20Santa%20Cruz/SC-02.htm to http://www.histarmar.com.ar/Naufragios/6%20Santa%20Cruz/SC-02.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215084351/http://werften.fischtown.de/archiv/preussen1.htm to http://werften.fischtown.de/archiv/preussen1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207063728/http://www.caphorniers.cl/preussen/ships_valpo.htm to http://www.caphorniers.cl/preussen/ships_valpo.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927013931/http://www.caphorniers.cl/preussen/potosi01_b.gif to http://www.caphorniers.cl/preussen/potosi01_b.gif
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)