Talk:Potion (song)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Cherrell410 (talk) 15:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

28.6%, but it's quotations
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

Leaving my suggestions for improvement below:

Lead: link disc jockey as most people won't know what that is
Lead: penned --> written
Background and composition: The disc jockey --> Harris
Background and composition: penned --> written (unnecessary synonym)
Background and composition: quotations around steamy hook from Lipa, a nimble verse from Thug, a snaking bassline, as it is being taken from the pitchfork website
Background and composition: quotations around seductive chorus. I don't know where thats being taken from, but thats an opinion. if it's not being taken from anywhere, remove it or reword it.
Music video: recruited --> something more encyclopedic

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Heyy @Cherrell410: hope you're well and thanks for another review. Everything is done. Cheers. Iaof2017 (talk) 11:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.