Talk:Potential analysis

Peer Review

The article is very well and logical structured. The first part gives a good definition and reasons why potential analysis are important to a companys long term success. Also the general analysis criteria are mentioned in the article. Furthermore the objectives, employee selection criteria and quality features of a potential analysis are very well described in the article. In the third part, the different analysis tools are described with regard to the scope of application, which is of high interest in terms of quality features of a potential analysis.

The article fits the wikipedia standards in regards of language and content. Also the article gives good information for readers who just want to gain a short overview of the topic. A more detailed view would be too complex for most readers.

In my opinion the article is quite good. Language and content match the wikipedia standards and the topic is very interesting from my point of view. Considering the growing importance of potential analysis in human ressources the interest in this topic will also grow in the future.

Potential Analysis

Peer Review

In my opinion your article about the “potential analysis” is pretty good. You started your introduction with a general part. Thus the reader gets the chance to bring the theme into a relation. This is followed by building up short terms. Afterwards you are more specific in the Thematic and then you trace the potential analysis in the talent management. Very good!

Once you've described the talent management you go to the point “Risks”. At this point I would add a summary about the positive aspects of the potential analysis to get an better overview. Most suitable could be an additional practical example.

In your article you are talking about "Figure 1, 2 and 3". Where can I find them?

In general, I find your article well constructed. You have a good English, you observe the rules of Wikipedia and give a brief and concise overview of this topic. Also your article has a lot of short introductions in other themes but you can get a quick overview about them for example the “Assessment Center”. Well performed!Schoki01 (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi Zvo.b, the article you wrote about the "potential analysis" is in my opinion well structured and is by using a good level of english easy to read and to understand. By the short and significant explanation of the term it is easy to follow the idea why this tool is useful in the area of human resources. The only thing which directly attracted my attention was that the footnotes e.g. 4,6,7 and 11 are not directly located behind the text. They are positioned under the text and disrupt the layout and the running text. Please also add some categories to your article, that it can be easier listed with similar articles. I hope you will find the suggestions to be useful and helpful. kind regards. Jensonthefirst (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

first of all I would like to thank you for your compliments. I will review the article once again and try to improve what you´va mentioned. Thanks again, Regards Zvo.b