Talk:Potential Royal Marine Course

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Might it be possible to remove almost all of the bolding?

It makes the article sound rediculous.

It's actually a rather poor article all round. For example, we're told that "achieving a level 11.2 minimum will be satisfactory" on the "VO2 Max bleep test", but there's absolutely no indication of what that actually means, nor of many of the other numerical scores given. It also says "you will be required" which makes me suspicious that it might simply have been copied from somewhere. I've several cleanup tags on it in the hope that someone with the requisite knowledge can improve it. 86.132.142.39 01:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous has no e.--I'll bring the food 01:35, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bleep test and the levels of it are quite well known I would have thought (one level for each 'lap' passed), and VO2 Max is a test of maximum oxygen consumption. Although I agree that this article needs cleaning up and presented in a more efficient fashion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.251.115 (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth reference appears to be advertising

It seems that the fourth external link is linking to a commercial site and looks suspiciously like advertising. Any thoughts on it's relevancy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.141.110.79 (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]