Jump to content

Talk:Poteau Runestone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alf Monges speculations

[edit]

There is no reliable source about this, his books are published on "Norseman press" who seems to have published nothing except books of Alf Monges speculations about the stone carvings. The books are hence self-published, and not reliable sources about this stone. I would also say that Monges theories are WP:FRINGE as not even most of those supporting the authenticity of north American runestones seem to support Monges theories.

I therefore think that Monges speculations should be removed, unless somebody can show that it's not fringe and that there are reliable sources about this. --OpenFuture (talk) 07:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]