This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Without reading up on the topic, I have no idea whether this term is a neologism or not. Instead of deleting, though, may I suggest that the page be connected with Michel Foucault in some manner, as the lead sentence seems to suggest that Postsexualism was his idea. This could be done either by merging the page into Michel Foucault or by renaming it to emphasise it's status as Foucault's neologism (e.g. Postsexualism (Michel Foucault) LordVetinari (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of the term, considered independently, is not clear. Considered dependently to Foucault's thought, however, it may pass the test. As well, a rough reading of fi:Postseksuaalisuus (Google translated) seems to suggest that it has influenced others' thought (Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari). Consequently, I'll be bold and remove the PROD but will still move the page as described above. (Of course, if the topic is more notable than I give it credit for, it may as well be moved back.) LordVetinari (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
