Talk:Postpartum confinement

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Society / Reproductive C‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as High-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HSLMASY.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting for now

@GeorgineLeung: @Bazj: I've redirected this for now, but offhand I can see postpartum confinement meriting its own article. For some reason I'd like to say that this is practiced in places other than East Asia, although admittedly I'm drawing on some dusty memory from one of my anthropology or religion classes from college so I could be wrong on that. Even so, I can see this meriting its own article at some point as long as Georgine could produce enough sourcing to justify this. I'll drop a note at the applicable WikiProjects asking for help. If/when this gets more sourcing, I have no problem with this getting un-redirected. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subsection at Postpartum_period#East_Asia has other cultures that do the same, so I can see where this could potentially be considered redundant information. Still, worth checking just to make sure. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The CSD nomination was facially invalid, and the nom in question (who is experienced enough to know better) ought to be ashamed of making such an obvious mistake. This has 600 words; the other section contains 133. Four times the number of words does not qualify for {{db-g10}}, even if we pretend (and we can't) that the title wasn't a valid redirect. This is, in fact, a perfectly good start to a desirable article. We should keep it and expand it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me?

They don't wash for 30 (or more) days? Wow. Then after that they suddenly "make contact with water" in hope of washing off the accumulated 30-days old filth? Can't be! It might have been apparent in ancient China where everyday toilet wasn't that important, but this can't be true in XXI century. 116.236.205.123 (talk) 08:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)CommieBandito[reply]

Globalise

I've done what I can to bring in other cultures, but this article could do with a lot more examples, and a theoretical overview. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Breastfeeding-7.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]