Talk:Postelsia/GA2
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This being reviewed as part of the GA sweeps. It is neutral, well-written, and somewhat sparsely but appropriately referenced. It is a little on the short side perhaps, but appears to cover all major topics. Images appear in order (assuming that Ms Oehms really meant "ffeel free" to use her animation!). The article retains its GA status. hamiltonstone (talk) 04:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)