Talk:Post-oak bluff

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Suggest moving page to "Post-Oak bluff"

In their respective books, Super System (1979) ISBN 1-58042-081-8 and Harrington on Hold'em, Vol. II (2005) ISBN 1-880685-35-3 , both Doyle Brunson (the undisputed popularizer of the term) and Dan Harrington consistently write the term as "Post-Oak bluff". Though it can be found written both ways in a variety of mediums (mostly on the Web), it was originally scribed "Post-Oak bluff" by the man who introduced it to the world. Brunson is widely considered to be one of the (if not the) most highly respected figures in the poker world and Harrington stands alongside him amongst poker's most elite players. And their books are some of the most highly praised poker books in publication. I strongly recommend that the guys who introduced the rest of the world to the term be trusted with its correct spelling: "Post-oak bluff", not "post oak". --Raoul Duke (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed notability, unreferenced, & unverified claims banners

Having added references (with inline citations) to two very reputable books---which, together, can affirm all the information contained in the article---I have gone ahead and removed the notability, unreferenced, & unverified claims banners which were in place for just under a year (since May 2008). If there are any objections, please voice them for discussion. If I have time, I may try to include some additional references. Thanks. --Raoul Duke (talk) 01:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Anyone have an explanation regarding the term "post oak"? Timmypees 22:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A post oak is a small tree (used for making fence posts, hence the name) and a post oak bluff is a small bet. Dave6 04:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A major edit in June 2007 by 208... changed the definition to something that I would call a "free card" bet. I reverted it entirely. --LDC 23:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub Designation

What else would we want to see in this page? I don't think it's a stub. Let's remove the stub comment.

--Limited Atonement (talk) 18:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]