Talk:Post-election pendulum for the 2011 New South Wales state election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Post-election pendulum for the 2011 New South Wales state election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Removed "v GRN" for the Liberal seats affected

Still we have no 2CP rather than 2PP values for Liberal seats that would have wound up v GRN, should prefs be distributed. However, I do recall reading the NSWEC does not distribute preferences when the winner wins over 50% of the primary vote. As nowhere has the 2CP figures, i'm inclined to think it's not going to happen. Thus, i've changed the pendulum back so every seat has a figure, which is the figures used by the ABC and presumably the NSWEC. Comments welcome. Timeshift (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fold into NSW election 2011

This is a great resource - but wouldn't it be better if it was folded into the main article about the 2011 NSW election? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.255.210 (talk) 04:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The convention has been to have a seperate page for the federal and the three eastern largest states, because that many seats begins to look very unweildy in an article. The fed/3-state articles all have links to the pendulum on them, so anyone reading the article has access to it. Timeshift (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]