Talk:Posiva

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

An immediate speedy deletion notice? That was a surprise. In any case, I'm supposed to explain "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because..." This is why: (1) Posiva is constructing the world's first deep geological repository of nuclear waste, which should be of some interest to readers; and (2), there were about five or six links to the company from other pages on the English Wikpiedia already, which appeared as red, indicating a non-existing article -- so it appeared clear to me that there was a demand for it. --Teemu Leisti (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I might also point out that the category Finnish company stubs includes many smaller and less important companies, in the sense that Posiva is an important part of Finland's energy infrastructure. (And no, I have no personal links of any sort with the company.) --Teemu Leisti (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added references to external sources that refer to Posiva. And I noticed that the introduction of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion says: "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. ... Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation." Respectfully, I submit to you that this page does not merit speedy deletion. Furthermore, I don't think it merits deletion at all, but if you do feel so, please start a normal deletion process by nominating the article for deletion. Thank you. --Teemu Leisti (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above was addressed to User:Noq, who added the speedy deletion tag to the article. Now another editor, User:Peridon, has removed the tag. Thanks. --Teemu Leisti (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]