Talk:Portrait of T. S. Eliot
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portrait of T. S. Eliot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Portrait of T. S. Eliot appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Royal Academy of Arts exhibited Wyndham Lewis' portrait of T. S. Eliot in 2018, after having rejected it 80 years earlier? Source: "...Wyndham Lewis's portrait of TS Eliot (Pl 1), which was rejected by the Royal Academy's 1938 Summer Exhibition Selection Committee." https://www.jstor.org/stable/48584658
- ALT1: ... that a 1938 portrait of T. S. Eliot caused a scandal when it was rejected by the Royal Academy of Arts?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ikmal Jaya
Created by NotVorticist (talk). Self-nominated at 17:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Portrait of T. S. Eliot; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |