Talk:Porthmadog railway station

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This page was expanded as part of The Great Britain and Ireland Destubathon, March 2020.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Untitled

Regarding the Heritage connexions, although quite near, The WHR(Porthmadog) station is not a joint station with BR (as in the case of Blaenau Ffestiniog and Minffordd on the FR) and I would be reluctant to see the BR Station entry expanded to cover the activities of WHR(Porthmadog) at the former Beddgellert siding location. Rather they are in similar position to the Talyllyn at Tywyn and perhaps ought to be listed in the same way. NoelWalley 15:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, I also wouldnt like to see a conection made with Harbour Station<!!>. However, I think the wording is such that no one would imply the proximity warranted joining to this article. --Keith 14:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, on re-reading again, I think I understand what you are implying. I place the mentioning of other "stations" which include the "Port" name purely as a wiki link, and no intention of implying they are joined physically. I do contest the ref to Minffordd railway station, as technically they are entirely seperate stations, albeit with the SG station only being accessible via passage , technically, from the NG station. --Keith 15:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Porthmadog railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140118075916/http://www.railwaymagazine.co.uk/news/bridge-fiasco-could-close-porthmadog-line-until-2015 to http://www.railwaymagazine.co.uk/news/bridge-fiasco-could-close-porthmadog-line-until-2015

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]