Talk:Port of Skagen
Appearance
Port of Skagen has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 25, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Port of Skagen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 November 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Port of Skagen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Krimuk90 (talk · contribs) 06:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Will review in the next couple of days. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lead
- Consider wikilinking and expanding the Danish currency krone on its first occurrence.
- " The harbour is currently being adapted to accommodate large international cruise ships". Please put "as of [year]" instead of "currently".
- Description
- No in-line citation for the part beginning with "The harbour consists of three main basins (docks with water levels controlled by flood gates): Ydre Forhavnsbassin..."
- History
- In the first sentence of this section, it is unclear what the proposal was all about.
- Fishing
- Wikilink herring, whiting and plaice.
- References
- Web ref. 2 is not formatted correctly.
@Dr. Blofeld: Happy to support when these comments have been addressed. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
@Krimuk90: Thanks for the review! All addressed I believe.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Denmark articles
- Mid-importance Denmark articles
- All WikiProject Denmark pages
- GA-Class Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- GA-Class maritime transport task force articles
- Low-importance maritime transport task force articles
- Maritime transport task force articles
- WikiProject Transport articles