Jump to content

Talk:Port Vale F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian Smith

[edit]

Hello, I am looking on information on Christian Smith, who was recently released and has signed for Clyde, as I am trying to create an article on him. Thanks. Ck12 19:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Port Vale FC.gif

[edit]

Image:Port Vale FC.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

Where is the first 100 years of it? 129.67.127.65 (talk) 14:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, someone who knows it write about it, will probably mean having to have a seperate article for the history then which is fair enough.--EchetusXe (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

I {{NPOV}}-tagged the article after reading the following:

  • These next two seasons, Vale fans were to witness some of the best football the club has ever played, and even had fans dreaming of the Premiership in the second half of the 1996/97 campaign.
  • The replay was to prove a night to remember, Vale Park was full to capacity, to see Guppy and McCarthy produce a masterclass in wing play.
  • The game finished 0-0, in a tie where The Valiants were arguably the better side, and should have won.

I can see there's more to come, so the tag should remain until I finish the copyedit. - Dudesleeper / Talk 20:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoke City "poorer supported"?

[edit]

Can it possibly be true that a League Two team is better supported than a Premier League team in the same city, or this just a bit of vandalism? Citation needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.70.148.131 (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Twas vandalism from earlier this month. Removed now. - Dudesleeper / Talk 06:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

This article is a mass of text, some pictures would really improve it.--EchetusXe (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:Freddie steele stokefootballer.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever they said to use it on the Stoke City article, we say the same but with the words 'Stoke City' replaced with the words 'Port Vale', thank you. They are low quality images of deceased people of no commercial value with no free alternatives. --EchetusXe (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potteries derby

[edit]

If anyone is interested I would love to create a good Potteries derby article. We could have the Stoke City season-by-season graph, create a Port Vale one and put them together onto one graph. Write various stats, players who played for both sides, table of results etc.

Now I have created it- Potteries derby. Only trouble is, some nuisance is trying to delete it. Contribute here if you wish to keep the article.--EchetusXe (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, feel free to add to the article though!--EchetusXe (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

The article says:

"Port Vale are one of two English league clubs not to be named after a geographical location (the second being Arsenal). The name Port Vale exists on maps pre-dating the 1876 formation of the club, and is a reference to a valley of ports on the Trent and Mersey Canal, associated with the city's pottery industry."

This appears not to make sense. If "Port Vale" is a name on maps describing a valley of ports then the name is after a geographical location.

"Arsenal" is arguably a geographical location too, being named after the Royal Arsenal at Woolwich. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.241.132 (talk • contribs)

Port Vale existed on maps, as in the name of various buildings, not of a specific area.--EchetusXe 16:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the information that has been provided, it is a "geographical location" according to my understanding of that term. I do not see how a named "valley of ports" can be anything else. Perhaps the author meant to say "not named after a town or city". That would make more sense to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.231.136 (talk • contribs)

By the same criteria, Crystal Palace would join Port Vale and Arsenal as English league clubs not named after a "geographical location". The writer really means to say "not named after a city or town". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.89.129 (talk • contribs)

Often the simplest solutions are the best.--EchetusXe 13:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe a good few years late now, but I think that this secion simply needs removing
"Port Vale is one of the few English league clubs not to be named after a city or town"
Arsenal, Chelsea, Everton, Tottenham Hotspur, Aston Villa, Crystal Palace and Fulham are seven such sides (out of only twenty) in the Prmier League alone. Removing this. L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 21:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They are all places... Chelsea, London; Everton, Liverpool, Tottenham; Crystal Palace, London, Fulham.--EchetusXe 00:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But the articles states Port Vale is " not named after a city or town". None of those places are either cities or towns, right? 84.93.221.7 (talk) 07:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose it was more accurate to say "not named after a geographical location" as it originally did. I'll change it.--EchetusXe 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How is that more accurate? The article makes clear that it is named after a geographical location, namely "a valley of ports on the Trent and Mersey Canal". As it stands the article is blatantly contradicting itself. Let's just remove the sentence. – Smyth\talk 09:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is no geographical location called Port Vale. It is not named after a geographical location. When the club was called Burslem Port Vale then Burslem was the location. But apart from that time the club was and is not named after a geographical location.--EchetusXe 01:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article says "The name Port Vale exists on maps pre–dating the formation of the club". So is that sentence wrong, or is the "not named after a geographical location" sentence wrong? They can't both be true. – Smyth\talk
"Here can be found Port Vale Street. Alongside the Trent and Mersey Canal sits Port Vale Flour Mill, where formerly there was a Port Vale Wharf, and once upon a time there was a Port Vale House along what is now Scott Lidgett Road (formerly Limekiln Road) in Longport. Longport was also home to the Midland and Port Vale Tileries, whose site is buried beneath the D Road." Not a geographical location, just stuff.--EchetusXe 09:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Surely the name "Port Vale" comes from a road in Hertford. Gwladys24 (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you think that?--EchetusXe 23:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's a road in Hertford called Port Vale & I've never seen it on a map anywhere else. Gwladys24 (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And still, a couple of years later it reads: "Port Vale is one of the few English league clubs not to be named after a geographical location, their name being a reference to the valley of ports on the Trent and Mersey Canal." The writer of this might well know some reason why this is not, technically, two conflicting phrases put into one sentence, but I am pretty sure the majority of people won't know what that reason is, and for this reason I don't think it's a very informative sentence - just in that, to the layperson, it's indistinguishable from a flat-out contradiction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.162.0 (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forest Green Rovers are not named after a geographical location. They are also a EFL team 192.28.126.101 (talk) 10:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The club was established in 1889 by Rev. E.J.H. Peach, representing the Forest Green area of Nailsworth.[3] --EchetusXe 13:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Port Vale Reserves

[edit]

The section regarding Port Vale Reserves contains an inaccuracy or at least an ambiguity: the team was definitely NOT in the Cheshire County League between 1963-64 season and the formation of the Northern Premier League in 1968-69. I watched the Chesire League regularly in those days and whislt there were a number of Reserve sides from the Football League (Chester, Wrexham, Tranmere, Crewe), Port Vale were not one of them212.167.5.6 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Guru[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Edit request on 7 March 2012

[edit]

On the 6th March 2012 Stoke-on-Trent City council applied to the high court to put Port Vale into Administration so that a buyer could be found for the Club.

CarlGratty (talk) 12:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would have preferred to wait until administration was confirmed but ok.--EchetusXe 18:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of chairmen

[edit]

Previous Chairmen

[edit]

Removed this an unreferenced, it is interesting though--EchetusXe 17:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Port Vale F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Port Vale F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Port Vale F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity

[edit]

We have added 203 seats to Vale park to lake the capacity 19,255 Pvfcrpn41 (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide any evidence of that? Thanks.--EchetusXe 12:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Port Vale F.C./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 15:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basic GA criteria

[edit]
  1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
  2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
  3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
  4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
  5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
  6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
  7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation.
  8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
  9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
  10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
  11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  12. No original research.
  13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
  14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
  15. Neutral.
  16. Stable.
  17. Illustrated, if possible.
  18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello, EchetusXe. I'll be doing this review and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a bit of copyediting needed and I've done that myself. The only problem was with the incomplete harvard citation method as links to the source books couldn't be achieved, so I fixed that using the cite book/ref=harv method. It's a very interesting article and I've learned quite a lot from it. I'm old enough to remember Roy Sproson playing and I knew he was the main man at Vale, spending all of his long career there. I'd forgotten that Scott Burgess went to Vale last year and I hope he's been doing okay.

Anyway, this is a good article and it passes the review. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I'd just slowly maintained it over the years and then realised with a bit of effort I could get it up to GA. It could so very easily have been Port Vale that fell into non-existence last year instead of/as well as Bury, sorry about your club.--EchetusXe 11:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, thanks. Maybe we'll come back to the league one day as a phoenix, like Halifax may be about to do if they can win their playoff. I'm hoping we are just a one-off and not the start of a domino effect. I don't want any other clubs going under. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • ... that after Port Vale F.C. were liquidated in 1907, a local church team took on the name and returned to the Football League by October 1919? Source: "Burslem Port Vale were an at end... an enthusiastic Cobridge Church committee negotiated a takeover of the ground of the late club and with the permission of the Football Association, changed the name of their first team to Port Vale... admission to the Second Division completed a remarkable meteoric rise from the North Staffordshire Church League to the Football League in only twelve years!" (Kent, Jeff (1990). The Valiants' Years: The Story Of Port Vale. Stafford: Witan Books. ISBN 978-09-50898-14-8.)

Improved to Good Article status by EchetusXe (talk). Self-nominated at 12:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Charley McMillan-Lopez

[edit]

Any Vale fans got any recollection of a player called Charley McMillan-Lopez being at the club - for context [see discussions on WikiProject Football] Zanoni (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No lol.--EchetusXe 17:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Port Vale is the only English Football League club not to be named after a place?

[edit]

Forest Green? 2A00:23C6:2E02:1001:506C:7A16:6FB6:4DC6 (talk) 11:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The club was established in 1889 by Rev. E.J.H. Peach, representing the Forest Green area of Nailsworth.--EchetusXe 15:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the statement as is is way too vague and unsourced, so I have removed it for now. It's unclear what a "settlement" is clearly defined as in terms of naming. Arsenal, although the team included Woolwich in its name in the past, is not really not named after a settlement but a munitions facility. Likewise, Crystal Palace is arguably named after the building and not the neighborhood. --Sasquatch t|c 18:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Port_Vale_F.C.&oldid=1204613369"