Talk:Port Louis, Falkland Islands

British Overseas Territories Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Falklands

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Falkland Islands work group (assessed as High-importance).

It is requested that a photograph of a modern, close-up view of the settlement be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the Falkland Islands may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

(First comments)

A map of East Falkland with the location of the town marked may be useful. Drutt 22:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So there it is, thanks for that. Drutt 20:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure so I'll go away and check my facts. But I think you'll find that Vernet's 1826 expedition was a failure, when they found that the Gaucho's couldn't use their horses in the peat bogs of the islands. The settlement did not become established till the next expedition in 1828. Justin A Kuntz 10:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference http://www.falklands.info/history/history3.html indicates the problems that they found. Also indicates that Vernet's colony did not start until 1828. Justin A Kuntz 11:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Made a couple of edits to correct minor historical errors. Also included reference to Vernet's co-operation with the British Government.

Latest Edit by Az81964444

Is partially correct. Guns and powder stores were destroyed according to Duncan's log, the Argentine Government claims that the whole settlement was destroyed. The people living there took the opportunity to leave because the place was pretty miserable and they claimed Vernet had lied about the conditions of the settlement. Never seen any source claiming malnutrition was a factor. Would someone review and edit accordingly please, seems whatever I do dormant accounts spring up to edit war. Justin talk 12:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Made an edit. It no longer mentions malnutrition, and also doesn't say "most" any more (since I assume that our readers are aware that 40 is more than 24). Pfainuk talk 20:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge tag

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Archived: There was no support for this idea. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a merge tag, suggesting it be merged into Puerto Soledad. I presume this comment, found on the Puerto Soledad talk page, is the rationale.

"There is no inflated 20th century significant, both articles deals with the same settlement, so why don't fuse them? The Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata, the United Provinces of the River Plate and Argentina is a bad analogy, because the are succesor states but nothing known as succesor settlements. Then we all have to see each articles lenght, they are not so long so they could properly fit together. Chiton magnificus (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)"[reply]

For the record I would oppose such a merger.
The previous merge proposal, moving Puerto Soledad to here, failed for lack of consensus, but it was at least logical.
There is no reason at all to move an article about a current location to one about a settlement that no longer exists. Xyl 54 (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no support fro this idea, so I've archived it. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Port Louis, Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100401100750/http://www.falklands.info/history/history3.html to http://www.falklands.info/history/history3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]