Talk:Porcupine (album)

Porcupine (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
July 7, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Porcupine (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I chose to review this article. Comments coming soon. REZTER ^TALK ø 17:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The fair-use rational on the cover art should be replaces with {{album cover fur}}

Done

The fair-use rational on the music samples should be replaced with {{Non-free use rationale}}

Done

All dates should be formatted as Month, day and year. Example: January 23 1998 ([[January 23]] [[1998]])

All dates are formatted per MOS:SYL

"It was these sessions that produced the band's next single, "The Cutter", which was released in January 1983 and went on to become the band's first Top 10 hit." Reference?

References added

"After Echo & the Bunnymen had finished recording Porcupine they played a free show in early November 1982 for 20,000 people at Sefton Park in Liverpool. Following this, WEA asked for three music videos and album art for the new album" Reference?

For which part? Neither are contentious, but I can add one for either or one for both.

"On 27 January 1982 Echo & the Bunnymen recorded their fourth session for British disc jockey John Peel's radio show on BBC Radio 1. Of these tracks, *"Smack in the Middle" was renamed and became "Higher Hell" on the album, while "Taking Advantage" was renamed "The Back of Love" and became the band's third single which was also included on the album.[3] Two other album tracks – "Clay" and "My White Devil" – were first played during the band's April 1982 tour of Scotland.[7]"

That whole paragraph should be moved to "Background and recording" with maybe some rewording to work with the other information.

Done

The "Music and lyrical content" needs a lot of work. That section should talk about what the musical and lyrical content are.

Some examples include:

- New things they introduced that was absent in previous recordings (for example extended guitar solos or influences from a certain genre)
- What the band were aiming to create (you can talk about what they changed when they were told to re-record the album)
- What they DID create like talk about the musical style including the genres and the like.
- Talk about the lyrical content, what the vocalist is talking about, is he using direct references to things? Using metaphors?

Of course this all needs to be sourced.

Renamed to "Musical content" as that's all I have access to.

Ref 1 NME should be wiki-linked.

Done

Allmusic should only be wiki-linked in the first ref, so it needs to be un-linked in ref 17.

Done --JD554 (talk) 09:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact me when you need more input. REZTER ^TALK ø 18:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish. REZTER ^TALK ø 12:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Porcupine (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Porcupine (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080406082547/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/17359-crocodiles-heaven-up-here-porcupine-ocean-rain-echo-the-bunnymen to http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/17359-crocodiles-heaven-up-here-porcupine-ocean-rain-echo-the-bunnymen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]