Talk:Population Connection

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 July 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article on Population Connection seems very weak and vague. The very few sources that are listed on this article seem to all be from their website or a similar primary source. It's worded almost directly from their website and the parts that aren't seem to just be someone's voice or opinions. Despite the lack of citations and neutrality, there seems to be a lack of content on this article's page as well. They list their campaigns and contributions but they don't intentionally explain each one. Adding to the campaign page and going over some of the sources could be a good start, and appropriating the citations as well as adding some neutral language will help elevate this article. Bsteele01 (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Brendan Steele[reply]

Untitled

What about the concept of zero population growth itself? Surely that should have its own article. xxxyyyzzz 16:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's covered indirectly at population control. -Will Beback 20:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny there's no mention of the "stop at two" slogan ZPG used to forward. One of the only things I directly remember from the time

External links

Stop Terrible Human Over Population Disasters (eCards website to limit human population growth)
WiseArt Cybernetics (On-line artistic slideshow about limiting human population growth)

Hallo Joyous! I have a question about your message: You ask me not to add inappropriate external links to wikipedia. When I compare the 2 links I added to other existing external links on certain webpages, I see that the 'appropriate' links (i.e the ones you leave alone), are also links to external -third party- organisations, such as our European organisation (STHOPD) is too. Our non-profit organisation works with volunteers and stands for certain principles which are similar to the 'appropriate' organisations on the webpages concerned, such as: Decreasing human overpopulation in an ethical way, having no children, warnings about the worldwide consequences of overpopulation such as the destruction of ecosystems. Please explain to me what would make our links appropriate. Friendly regards, 213.84.166.83 18:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC) MetaMouse.[reply]