Talk:Poor Cow
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Poor Cow DVD cover.jpg
[edit]Image:Poor Cow DVD cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Why does Poor cow direct to MOVIE not ORIGINAL NOVELL?
[edit]I really sugest that the "poor cow" main article is about the novell. It is the orignal poor cow, and the movie only disorts from it. Many people still read the novell (i do think:), and therefore Poor Cow (Movie) should be under the "disambigiuous", not the other way around. 128.39.93.100 11:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Jarle
- Yes, I think so too. — MY, OH, MY! 21:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)