Jump to content

Talk:Pony of the Americas/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Keilana (talk · contribs) 02:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Here are my comments on this.

  • Is "in the United States" necessary when linking to Iowa?
  • I think so. I know that when you click on the Iowa link it immediately says it's a state in the US, but I'd prefer to lay this out up-front to readers, especially since it's not one of the more well-known states. Dana boomer (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That makes sense, leave it as is then.
  • The phrase "and within 15 years has registered 12,500 ponies" is unclear.
  • It's fine now, I get what you're saying.
  • You're inconsistent with your use of the Oxford comma; if you like it, then you need a comma after "specific height", "muzzle", and "the refinement of the Arabian". I personally prefer it, so that's what I noticed. :)
  • I must be crazy. O.o I could have sworn I saw a few. As long as you're consistent, I don't care - so you're good to go.
  • Can you specify the "other disciplines" in the lead?
  • Much better. :)
  • Reword "nor is ancestry (such as the American Paint Horse breed) indicative of pinto coloring"
  • Yeah, it's less clunky, but I still have no idea what the American Paint Horse has to do with any of this.
  • Comment it's a horse people thing. Pinto/Paint patterns are often dominant over leopard spotting, so POA and Appaloosa people totally freak out about it. It's a huge deal to them that their horses do not carry even a hint of the Pinto/Paint patterns because of the genetic havoc they can wreak when breeding for the little leopard spots.
  • You use both "it" and "they" to refer to the pony/breed, which is correct?
  • Better! Nice job.
  • Can you explain the "pony" vs. "horse" thing further? I'm not an equine enthusiast, sorry. <sheepish grin>
  • I've added a bit here to show that the distinction is based on physical characteristics and size. I can add more if you'd like me to - just wasn't sure how deeply I should go in an individual breed article. Dana boomer (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It makes more sense now. Thanks for the gloss on phenotype - I didn't notice that missing as a science type! :)
  • "Along with crosses between registered POAs..." is clunky, maybe more the Appaloosa/Arabian thing earlier?
  • It's better, still a little hard to follow. I'm being picky though!
  • Should "crosses to other breeds" be "crosses with other breeds"? What does the literature say?
  • Is it "Arabian, Appaloosa, Shetland" or "Arabian/Appaloosa/Shetland"? You use both.
  • In "Over the years between the founding of the breed club and the present", remove "over the years" for clarity.
  • Why has the Shetland blood been bred out? I'm confused.
  • To make the horse look more like the little stock horse type that the original breeder was breeding towards. Shetland ponies tend to be small and fat and hairy, which was definitely not what he was looking for :)
  • Haha that explains so much! I like the way you explained it in the article without saying "fat and hairy" though.
  • Just to clarify, it's a youth-oriented club because the pony was bred for children/small adults to ride?
  • Yes. Also, they have a ton of youth-focused and youth-only shows, activities, etc., which a lot of registries (especially relatively smaller registries like this one) don't. I wasn't sure how deep I should go into the registries activities, or where I was crossing the line between describing the registry and promoting their activities. Dana boomer (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's fine as it is.
  • What is an "under saddle age limit", and does it apply to pony, human, or both?
  • It all makes sense now!
  • Is there perhaps an image of the pony in one of those events, or maybe a historical image? It's not a huge deal if there isn't.
  • The best image I have been able to find of the breed is the one in the infobox, and I'm not really even happy with that one. I haven't been able to find anything historical or in competition. I did add in an image of a pure-blood Appaloosa, as a founder of the breed, just so people can see what the "original" looks like. Does this work? Dana boomer (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, I like seeing the difference between the original Appaloosa and the POA. It's nice!
  • The references look good.

Lovely job on a short but sweet article. I've got an eye on this page and promotion shouldn't be too far along! :) Keilana|Parlez ici 02:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I believe I've addressed everything above, but had a few questions, so please let me know if there is additional work you would like to see done. I actually really appreciate having a non-horse person look at the articles I write, since they tend to see jargon and completeness issues that I completely miss due to my familiarity with the subject. Dana boomer (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I had one or two comments in return. I totally understand about the non-specialized reader thing, I love having non-astronomy people read my articles because they read it completely differently. Great job! Keilana|Parlez ici 17:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks Keilana, this one is all Dana's baby, but hope I could answer some questions. (It's not really relevant here, but I once got a temporary national card to judge a regional POA show because they needed three judges and there weren't three regular POA qualified judges in Montana, normally I do other stuff, but it was a delightful experience, great owners and exhibitors!) Montanabw(talk) 19:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the answer, is there any way one of you could gloss that in the article? I think it may be confused to readers who aren't as educated about horses. Montana - I remember you from a mediation years and years ago, it's good to see you still doing great work. :) Keilana|Parlez ici 19:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I made a tweak to the bit about the Paints, hope that helped! Saw a couple other really minor things to tweak. Montanabw(talk) 20:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Montana! Keilana, is there anything else you'd like to see done on the article? Dana boomer (talk) 00:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, I'm totally happy with this. I'll do all the promotion bits now. Congratulations, and nice work! I definitely learned something from this. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Dana boomer (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pony_of_the_Americas/GA1&oldid=1083530265"