Talk:Ponte 16
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ponte 16 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opening comment
[edit]See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macau#Economy, Ponte 16 is listed as one of the big future casinos along with other notable casinos.
Accor Hotel has official webpage for Ponte 16.
Speedy deletion
[edit]the reason given on the tag of speedy deletion is not justified. Similar articles were created in wiki like Venetian Macao, Sands Macao, etc. Coloane (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I have no idea what the guy above is talking about, but this article needs to go, and any relevant information merged with Sofitel Macau At Ponte 16 since that is what this building is, now that it is opened and completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caspar esq. (talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Opening of the Ponte 16.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Opening of the Ponte 16.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Opening of the Ponte 16.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
Delete - this is a duplicate of existing page
[edit]This page is a duplicate of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sofitel_Macau_At_Ponte_16
It appears its not as nice looking as the other, but there's some data that could be copied over if someone wants to. I suggest deleting the page.