Talk:Pomeroy State Park

Pomeroy State Park has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 26, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pomeroy State Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 05:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Looks good, very little comments (made some copy edits):

No pic this time?
"The Town of Lebanon": is it supposed to be capitalized like this?
"Oh Ranger" is techincally Oh, Ranger! and should be italicized.
"Joseph Leary noted": Joseph Leary who?

Hold for 14. 23W 06:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: For Town of Lebanon - yes, because it is the governmental body and not the location. Oh Ranger has been fixed and updated to reflect it is a website. I do not have a picture for the park and I cannot use anything other than CC by SA because of image use policy. Flickr did not turn up anything on last check. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisGualtieri: Changes look good, no sweat about the pictures. There is this source which describes it in the context of conservation, but it mostly rehashes what's mentioned in the article. Might be good to include later, but I won't hold the review for it. Passing. 23W 23:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting source you dug up, it is far from the most neutral or detailed source in existence - it exists to garner funding support. The problem with it - this is a state park and is not a local body that controls it. The Town of Lebanon has the Open Space group, but Pomeroy is "open space" but not under their actual jurisdiction or control. The short blip on Pomeroy State Park adds nothing of real importance, but this might be good if I work on the towns. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]