Talk:Polygondwanaland

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Polygondwanaland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Public domain?

The article says the album "will be entirely in the public domain" (which should be "is" now that it's out), but is it really true? If a band says "This album is FREE. Free as in, free. Free to download and if you wish, free to make copies. Make tapes, make CD’s, make records." is that enough lawful evidence for public domain? Law stuff is very complicated and the statement of the band doesn't even mention derivative work. So it's actually closer to the Creative Commons license attribution, no derivatives. But the license/legal code of that license is very long, so is a statement like that from the band really enough? Or could they retract that later? And what exactly are the terms? Even if these questions can't be answered this text shouldn't just assume public domain.

Regards -- 5.145.128.4 (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the [Bandcamp release page](https://kinggizzard.bandcamp.com/album/polygondwanaland), the tracks are listed under a CC BY-ND3 license--meaning some copyright protections are reserved. This places the album outside of the public domain.

Best BaronMarquis (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]