Talk:Politics of Minnesota

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Politics of Minnesota article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Minnesota Top‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Historical figures of note or Democrats of note ?

First I realize anyone can edit wikipedia and if I disagree with stuff I can change it but, outside of Jim Janos (Jesse Venure) everyone on this list as of now is a Democrat. I fully realize the Dems have some giants from Minn especially in the last 60 years but perhaps when people are creating the list they can think back to the 19th and early 20th century. Knute Nelson, Frank B. Kellogg John S. Pillsbury even Harold Stassen (yes he is probably now more famous for running every four years for president ) but he help founded the UN. Smith03 22:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think some of the ones mentioned might be notable enough to have their own little section and picture. Which are household names outside of Minnesota? Appraiser 23:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a question of being household name outside the state or people who had a great impact for the state and nation? If we are looking at just people who are just household names I don't think many outside or inside the state of Minnesota today would know who Floyd B Olson was. However Kellogg served as sect of State in 1920 and won a noble prize for peace in 1929 Kellogg-Briand Pact. Pillsbury served as governor of Minnesota and is known as the father of the U of Minnesota for donating money to it to keep it going . Nelson served the people of Minnesota for decades as US Senator and governor. Stassen had a role in the early UN after serving as governor and than resigned the office to serve in the Navy during WWII. Smith03 00:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Senate Composition

I would think a note regarding the original structure of the Senate was more like the US Senate with equal representation per county would be helpful. I've been looking for references but no luck yet.

Fair use rationale for Image:Harold Stassen.gif

Image:Harold Stassen.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historically progressive / more recently a swing state

This analysis seems a bit off, if one looks at United States Congressional Delegations from Minnesota -- it looks like there've been split delegations for the majority of the time since 1950, and if anything the state got less split in the 1990s: Democrats held 6 of 8 Congressional seats from 1993 through 2001, a level of dominance they had never had in earlier decades. --Delirium 02:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota elections

Good source on Minnesota elections and voter participation:[1] Kablammo (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "the highest of any U.S. state (with a national average of 60.93%), due in part to its liberal voter registration laws" is asserting a causal relationship that is not supported by a citation. It should be changed to "the highest of any U.S. state (with a national average of 60.93%). Minnesota's voter registration laws are as follows..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.73.247 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Characterizing the registration laws as liberal should also be cited or removed.Acceptablefalsehoods (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franken as "historical figure of note"?

Al Franken has yet to be sworn in. We cannot predict how significant he will be. He is now in the news, but it is premature to list him as a "historical figure of note". I have removed him. Kablammo (talk) 01:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider including Al Frankin as a senator. 2601:204:C380:2950:28B4:423C:C3F:72F0 (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned at the top of the page, there are others who could or should be mentioned. If national significance is the test, Henry Sibley can be added to that list. As this is a project of volunteers, he and others will have to await the interest of editors. Whether Jesse Ventura, a one-term governor, should be included, is open to debate. Kablammo (talk) 02:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added POV tag

IMO there are many quotes in "long term trends" section that are biased and do not reference any statistics:

"Business fought unions, and the unions fought back, and with the governor on their side unions won some violent battles in the 1930s" - no mention of what these "battles" are, or why the union side won "with the governer on their side" or "violently"

"Labor unions are a shadow of their old strength" citation needed

"The New Right has mobilized social conservatives, especially those from traditional religious backgrounds, with abortion a furiously contested issue" also completely baseless

"State government has become much more friendly toward growth and the needs of business entrepreneurship" clearly phrased to promote conservative viewpoints as "friendly towards growth" and "the needs of business". Again no specifics given.

This section should be deleted or replaced with a discussion about statistical and demographic trends and voting patterns in Minnesota.

198.144.7.12 (talk) 01:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Pete Stauber official photo (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of Content is Out of Date

There's a lot of references to the 2008 and 2012 election, and the congressional map is not yet updated to the 2020 census and redistricting. A lot of the page needs to be updated to reflect the current political climate in the state. Ejkrause (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]