Talk:Political positions of Kamala Harris/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Political positions of Kamala Harris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Capital Punishment
I am contemplating an edit to the Capital Punishment section. It may be controversial, so Im discussing before editing. Sen. Harris position on capital punishment has shifted over the years. As District Attorney of San Francisco she strongly opposed capital punishment. As Attorney General of California her office prosecuted capital punishment cases, and opposed efforts to allow potentially innocent persons from accessing exculpatory evidence. As a United States Senator she has co-sponsored bills to eliminate Federal capital punishment, yet would permit the states to continue to go their own way. In short, her record is far more mixed than the current article suggests. Rklahn (talk) 04:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Im close to taking silence as consent here and start an edit on the page. As a practical matter, I probably wont do anything for about 24 hours. Rklahn (talk) 07:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't seem to be able to find my WP:NPOV on this subject, so Im going to take a pass. Rklahn (talk) 03:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Positions on India
What's with the weird word choice in the Foreign Policy - India section? The tone of that section seems off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:1601:540:75A5:4969:CCD4:410D (talk) 03:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Could you please specify what you're referring to? Most of it was taken from the source. I've also edited the section a bit after your comments. --Athosindia —Preceding undated comment added 17:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Clean up abortion section
I've been doing some cleanup, but most of this section doesn't relate to KH's political positions; rather it seems to be raising controversies to try to portray her in a negative light. KH's position on abortion is all that needs to be stated. She's pro-choice. Nuff said. Seananony (talk) 04:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever. She is extreme liberal on everything.
- The piece here is doctored and fact-check: FALSE by numerous omissions such as her positions to de-fund the police, not enforce border laws, big spending on which she cast many tie-breaking votes and of course abortion with no limits at all.
- Wikipedia's entry here is more of the cover-up and lies from democrats and the Biden administration in particular.
- And before Biden withdrew his nomination (for unstated reasons, which he has never explained), she was not considered to be an asset due to her constant gaffes and losing 92% of her staff due to her workplace anger and derision.
- Her record is being scrubbed for political reasons here just as with televised and cable news broadcasts and print media.
- She no longer stands by her own record and statements. She is a radical San Francisco liberal. And she should just own it and run on it.
- Fake, false and full of omissions on this profile of Kamala Harris.
- 2601:1C2:4582:B30:4810:CB94:A9DF:A954 (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The "cleanup" you do is to scrub comments by people. Humans that may not agree. Your own bias shines through. Let the people speak here on Wiki. 2601:1C2:4582:B30:4810:CB94:A9DF:A954 (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Does endorsement by a senator who happened to be shot equate to gun control policy?
I feel like this sentence fragment should be updated:
"During her run for Senate, Harris was endorsed by former U.S. Representative Gabby Gifford's, who was shot in Tucson in 2011,:
The implication is that Gabby Gifford's endorsement equates to support for gun control because gabby was shot and that encouraged her to be pro gun control, but I don't like relaying on implication alone. If Gabby is a strong supporter of gun control legislation then we should cite that directly rather then leaving it up to implication. Honestly unless Gabby explicitly said her endorsement was *because* of Harris's policies about guns I'm not sure it's relevant here. There are many reasons a democrat may endorse another democrat, just because one is pro gun control and endorses another does not mean that the other must therefor be pro gun control. Less relevant but the quote also doesn't make it clear if the endorsement happened before or after the shooting where the timing does impact the implication in my mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.51.12.195 (talk) 20:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @144.51.12.195 Agree. I vote delete. Seananony (talk) 23:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @144.51.12.195 Fixed. Seananony (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Grocery prices
Harris said the 1.6% profit margin for supermarkets was "excessive," and she wants to impose price controls on food.
Economists responded by saying that this would cause food shortages.
This is receiving a massive amount of news coverage. I think it should be included in the article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/15/kamala-harris-price-gouging-groceries/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/08/15/kamala-harris-economic-policy-2024/
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/15/harris-corporate-price-gouging-ban-food-election.html
https://abcnews.go.com/US/harris-propose-ban-grocery-price-gouging-cool-inflation/story?id=112864648
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/15/business/economy/kamala-harris-inflation-price-gouging.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/14/harris-food-prices-economy-speech-00174112
https://time.com/7011214/kamala-harris-campaign-federal-ban-price-gouging-food-groceries-inflation/
https://www.barrons.com/articles/kamala-harris-food-prices-gouging-grocery-stocks-001b7e5f
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/15/nx-s1-5077776/kamala-harris-child-tax-credit-housing
The Last Hungry Cat (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Climate Change/Energy & Environment
I feel like CC should go under E&E, not the other way around, and there needs to be more than one subsection or there no point. I would put it above Foreign Policy. Seananony (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
I agree and I plan to work on this in the next few weeks. Rkarapin (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
History of her criminal justice policies record
https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/kamala-harris-criminal-justice-policies-california-rcna163518 WIKILMK (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Food inflation. Donald gave big farmers 36-40 billion dollar due too his war on China. Now they turn around and charge the people high food prices . Donald created the problem 2600:100D:A0EE:5341:19D:80C3:B4C1:DA (talk) 21:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Social Issues - criminal justice
This section's inclusion of the Floyd tweet (without donating) seems awkward since it essentially acts as a Trojan Horse to add criticism by Trump. I'm not against adding criticism by Trump or anyone notable, but perhaps it would would be better suited to a section specifically for criticism. Which leads to my second point in that this is not a criticism of her political positions. So why is that part in here in the first place? Cheers. DN (talk) 03:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Fracking
Her changing views on fracking should be included here. Sources: The Hill, Axios, AP, Fortune Ca talk to me! 14:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Unreasonable deletion of "lifetime ratings" table
A lifetime ratings table was deleted, without reasonable justification:
- remove table which is not referred to anywhere in the body text
I do not think that the presence of tables should be justified by text. This user removed the efforts of another one, without a reasonable motivation and without any attempt to improve the situation.
Please, consider my point. I think we should restore it. Cats' photos (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's reasonable to include this table if it is referred to somewhere in the text with content sourced from RS. DMH223344 (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @DMH223344. You deleted the work of another user. On which official rule it is based your decision? Cats' photos (talk) 14:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- check for example WP:BEBOLD DMH223344 (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with @Cats' photos but I'll add it to the end, I think it should definitely be in the article, but might be a better fit as an appendix type thing. JSwift49 13:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @DMH223344 It is a generic policy. You deleted another user's contribution. Cats' photos (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- check for example WP:BEBOLD DMH223344 (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @DMH223344. You deleted the work of another user. On which official rule it is based your decision? Cats' photos (talk) 14:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Add A Fact: "Biden, Harris caution against Middle East conflict escalation"
I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote: “President Biden and I do not want to see conflict in the Middle East escalate into a broader regional war,” Vice President Kamala Harris said in a statement Saturday that echoed Biden’s description of a “measure of justice.” She added, “Diplomacy remains the best path forward to protect civilians and achieve lasting stability in the region.”
The fact comes from the following source: https://apnews.com/article/biden-hezbollah-nasrallah-israel-lebanon-024756fb7c2b7bdda93454db97659a19
Here is a wikitext snippet to use as a reference:
{{Cite web |title=Biden and Harris call the Israeli strike killing Hezbollah’s Nasrallah a 'measure of justice' |url=https://apnews.com/article/biden-hezbollah-nasrallah-israel-lebanon-024756fb7c2b7bdda93454db97659a19 |website=AP News |date=2024-09-28 |access-date=2024-09-29 |language=en |quote=“President Biden and I do not want to see conflict in the Middle East escalate into a broader regional war,” Vice President Kamala Harris said in a statement Saturday that echoed Biden’s description of a “measure of justice.” She added, “Diplomacy remains the best path forward to protect civilians and achieve lasting stability in the region.”}}
Additional comments from user: proposed text based on the source: On September 28, 2024, in response to the Israeli airstrike that killed Hassan Nasrallah, Harris said the killing provided "a measure of justice" to the victims of Hezbollah. She reiterated her commitment to Israel's security and opposed a broadening of the conflict.
See also her statement: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/09/28/statement-by-vice-president-harris-on-the-death-of-hassan-nasrallah/
This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension. ProfGray (talk) 13:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Progressive claim by Bernie
Shouldn't it be mentioned that she is considered a "progressive" by Bernie Sanders who had to moderate to appeal a larger base for the elections. I may be biased but she has stated that she still has the "same values". She is even mentioned on the wiki page progressives except Palestine and had run on a progressive platform in 2020. She had one of the most liberal voting records in Congress. Nohorizonss (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)