Talk:Political party strength in South Carolina

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Bob Livingston

There is another American politician by that name from Louisiana, as well as a musician. Does this need a disambiguation page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.95.190 (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Code

In the code it says the House Delegates are Palin and McCain, and the people they voted for are numbers. I'm not great with codes, so if someone could please change it. It's around the end of the page. Mikeyandreality (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2016 information for legislatures

I don't think we need to annotate every vacancy in the state legislature here, but they're generally going to happen a few times a year. Even our current count for the state House is inaccurate, due a vacancy last month. Because of that uncertainty, predicting information for 2016 goes against WP:CRYSTAL, because we don't really know how the special elections will turn out. All of the other "Political party strength in (US state)" articles end at 2015 for that reason, and this one should too, at least for the state legislatures. -LtNOWIS (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The SC political party strength page is not making predictions here, as all the elected officials have terms through 2016. If an event happens that changes it, then we note it and make changes accordingly (would had to regardless). However, that said, I have no qualms if we remove 2016 to keep it consistent with other state political party pages. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]