Talk:Political Marxism

POV

This article was obviously written by subscribers to this relatively small school of Marxist thought. NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.49.144 (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:POV#When_to_remove

You may remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved.
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given.
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

The anonymous author of the first post in this thread gave no specific objection, hence condition#=2 holds. Tlroche (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Neo-Marxism

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge as proposed; alternative appropach have some support but no consensus. Klbrain (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Neo-Marxism. I hesitantly consider , perhasp they're the same thig? this page explicitly says 'neo-Narxst' FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Political Marxism seems mostly attached to Brenner, while Neo-Marxism encompasses at least Political Marxism and also the Frankfurt School that inspired it. This article is short and not likely to see much expansion, so merging would be viable, but not necessary. The Neo-Marxism article should say probably say more about Political Marxism. It might be worth considering merging Brenner debate into Political Marxism. Sennalen (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Merger - an article needing expansion isn't necessarily a reason to remove it via a merger. If the article has the potential to cover new ground, it should be left to do so for as long as the topic area can be proven to be distinct from other articles, whilst still fitting notability requirements. 115.64.101.197 (talk) 03:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Merge Concur w/ 115.64.101.197. The term Neo-Marxism is so hopelessly vague as to mean nothing, because practically every Marxist in 2023 deviates from or innovates on the 19th century works of M&E to some degree. Political Marxism has a clear definition and can be contrasted with other viewpoints like WS thry or Cohen's technicism. However, I don't think it would be unreasonable to merge w/ Brenner debate in some way Nicknimh (talk) 20:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.