This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Sorry to be not precise - when exactly in 1944 did he join PPS? Did he represent the PPS in PKWN as the article says, or rather the RPPS?
Xx23609:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is changing it from Moscow to Soviet Union more correct? In the first place, it is no longer grammatically correct in the English language as written by you, secondly I think "poetic license" allows a better Wikipedia without such "corrections". Dr. Dan01:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is en encyclopedia, not a poem. Times where Moscow was important enough to warrant a state-like name (Muscovy) ended centuries before 20th century, PKWN was a Soviet Union's puppet, not of the city of Moscow. Sure, most readers may understand a 'poetic analalogy', but some won't (remember we have kids reading this and so on) - and we must make the article as unconfusing as possible.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And we must make the article as unconfusing as possible. Sounds nice, but it has not been what my experience with you and many of your edits and efforts on Wikipedia have led me to believe is your own belief. While Wikipedia is not a poem, it is not a depository for incorrect English spelling, syntax and grammar, to replace a grammatically correct one. So you are now advocating "functionality" and against enhancing the project with style and literary enhancement? Hopefully when you write in your native language you do so yourself. As for Moscow being appropriate here (and also not confusing), it was the capital of the Soviet Union. When one speaks of policies emanating from Washington, no one is confused. In fact saying that the policy stems from the United States might even be too broad. The policies emanating out of Washington and Moscow were just that, and not emanating out of Yellowstone or Lake Baikal. I think it's another case of simply liking yourself and your viewpoint more than mine. Do correct your grammatical error, and work on your English. Dr. Dan17:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Mikolajczyk did not join the PKWN. He became the second Deputy Premier and minister of agriculture in the Polish Provisional Government of National Unity formed in Moscow in June 1945, recognized by the Western Powers in early July that year.
Anna M. Cienciala." Novickas (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]