This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
1. Your intro section which outlines the post-communist transition of Poland is not general enough. Consider adding an intro section that talks about the general relationship between Poland and the World Bank throughout there time existing rather than just that short period.
2. The structure of this article is fine, but it could benefit from having more sections related to each individual banks involvement in Poland. You could also talk about World Banks stated goals in Poland.
3. There only issue of balanced coverage in this article is that you focus heavily on recent trends and the post communist transition, but you have not talked about the period of time in between such as the early 2000's or the 2008 crash.
4. The article does a good job of remaining neutral throughout, and does not make any unsubstantiated claims or claims that are made specifically to support a particular argument.
5. This article is severely lacking in sources. You need to make sure to site all data that you put into your article, and also you should be citing at least once or twice a paragraph.
Jcraighe (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Jcraighe[reply]
