Talk:Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 19, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
1) There were numerous punctuation errors throughout. For example, 'After dubbing it a weaker version of "Toxic" he said "And that...' requires two commas here. There are many more. I have fixed all of these but I do suggest that editors working on this to take a closer look at punctuation for future GANs.

2) Online websites should not be in single quotes. They are not styled at all (i.e. no italics, etc.). See One Time (song) as an example. Also, there is inconsistency here. Sometimes they are in single quote marks and sometimes they are italicized, e.g. Digital Spy. Please make them all consistent and unformatted.

Done --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Article is properly referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Article complies to WP:NPOV.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Just a few minor things that have to be fixed, but everything else is looking good. – SMasters (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing all the fixes. I'm confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]