Talk:Poison/Archive 1

Archive 1

Comment 1

I moved ammonia out of the elemental poisons, for obvious reasons, and added a few more in its category.

Question - do we want to add substances which can be fatal by displacing oxygen (N_2, He, etc), or are those not regarded as "poisons?" Pakaran. 16:18, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

If we add every substance which can kill by displacing oxygen, that nasty dihydrogen monoxide would need to be put back into the article at the top of a very long list of chemicals capable of killing this way. Just about any substance could easily serve this nefarious role in either liquid or gaseous form. --66.102.74.57 03:23, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

---

Redundant nitric acid info

Nitric acid, as a strong oxydizer (sic), has particularly harmful effects; it can cause scarring if it splashes someone while being boiled in the lab.

This does not belong here, if someone wants the specifics of nitric acid, they can look it up separately. Besides, nitric acid is not any more dangerous than most other strong inorganic acids. Should we state the specifics of each and every one?

Darrien 05:32, 2004 Jul 17 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough. I have a high school chem teacher who swears up and down that he'll never boil it again, or keep it unlocked in concentrated form. Pakaran. 14:45, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Cleanup really needed

This page really needs to be cleaned up. The definition of poison used in this article is way too vague. Poison shouldn't be used a synonym for anything that causes harm. This may sound weird, but just because it can be said that "experiences whatever poisoning" does not mean that "whatever" is actually a poison. I'll agree with the article on this; toxic and poisonous seem to be synonyms but something that's toxic is not necessarily a poison.

Here's a list of what I think should be moved out:

• neurotoxins (belongs in toxin)
• nerve gas (belongs elsewhere)
• potassium chloride (anything in high enough concentration can do the job, including water and salt)
• anything related to venom (venom and poison should not be considered the same)
• all of the three acids
• halogens (the deadly aspect of KCl is potassium, not the halogen)
• phosporus
• carbon monoxide
• anything in mutagens, carcinogens or teratogens. UV rays definitely not poisons. Cancer and poison are two totally different things. Thalidomide was not poisonous; the mothers didn't die.

It seems odd to me to consider toxins produced by bacteria as poisons. Some of these things are always there, they are just kept in check. Anything relating to bacterial toxins should be moved out of poison and into toxins. A big criteria for poison should be that it can cause harm if ingested and the mechanism of injury once ingested should be somewhat distinctive. Eating fish hooks, broken glass and magnets is dangerous but they are not poisons. They will cause damage by physical means. I have problems with HCl being considered as a poison, especially since there's some of it in my stomach right now. Drinking it would cause extensive bleeding and tissue damage but that's caused by chemical burning. This same idea applies to bleach and ammonia.

On the other hand, I don't mind including common compounds that have a high likelyhood of being ingested in a normal environment because laypersons who visit the article might expect to find household cleaning products under poisons.

Thoughts? --jag123 18:22, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I've been thinking that the poison and toxin pages should be merged with toxin being a subset of poison. At least that is my understanding of how the terms are used. As far as venom goes, aren't venomous snakes also called poisonous snakes? I'm just not sure that you can find a subset of toxic substances that can be definitively be called "poisons" as separate from "toxins" or "venoms". That's why I'd argue that it all come under the umbrella of poison, that being the most broad term. Or at least clean things up so that the separate toxin or venom pages are clearly defined and linked. - Trick 00:24, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

An animal that is venomous delivers a toxin via a special apparatus such as a fang, dart or a stinger. An organism that is poisonous may be harmful if the toxins are ingested or absorbed. You can also say that a poisonous organism doesn't use its toxins in an active fashion to kill or maim predators or prey, unlike a scorpion, which uses its stinger to kill food or honeybees that will sting if threatened. Venom and poison are not synonyms. That's why you never hear poison ivy or certain mushrooms as being venomous. Common usage is one thing but someone who finishes reading an article on poison should at least be aware that venomous animals may not necessarily be poisonous. In the same respect, this person shouldn't read that bleach is poisonous, especially when the containers don't even carry the skull & crossbones symbol, only the corrosive symbol. Toxin should definitely not be merged here. I've started seeing definitions that specify toxins as organism-manufacured protein containing compounds that typically induce antibodies. An appropriate umbrella term would be "toxic substance" --jag123 02:05, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

To clarify a little about what I will be cleaning up on the poison and toxin articles: toxins are a subset of poisons. The problem deals with common usage of the terms versus technical usage of the terms. In common writing and talking we use the two as almost synonomous "snake bite poisoning" when technically a snake venom is a toxin. A toxin is truly a natural occuring poison (all other poisons are man made). Most natural poisons are biologically produced. Hence some naturally occuring poisons are not toxins (volcano smoke contains several poisons).

Most technical usage of the words can be split between the medical, technical, and military fields.

El guero "Wayne"

Toxins are not just natural, they are biological (produced by animals, plants, bacteria, etc.). There can be natural poisons of mineral origin, for example. (Oops, sorry, this comment was redundant. I started writing it because first you said that all other poisons are man made, but later you corrected that by giving an example of a natural poison that's not a toxin...) Itub 00:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Sweeteners

I reverted an anon's deletion of the mention of the artificial sweeteners; while their carcinogenic nature is contested, it is quite true that they have been argued to be carcinogens. —Tkinias 21:57, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yushchenko

Yushchenko's poisoning is not "alleged"; medical tests have shown that he has suffered dioxin poisoning. What is "alleged" is that Ukranian intel was involved, but this article does not mention that. —Tkinias 22:49, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Somebody may want to check out...

the list of chemical weapon agents. The majority of thart of the topic of this article. Worse, the text of that section is covering material relevant to all kinds of poisoning. Can anyone suggest a more meaningful section title? Pzavon (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC) [edit] Fork article "Poisoning"?

There is a list of all ICD poisoning classes in the article. This should be under a separate list article, or there should be a different article "Poisoning". Not all poisonings result from GHS/EU/ICSC-classified poisons. --Vuo (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Ground glass

While not at all a poison, it is a common myth that ground glass can act like a poison[1]. (See for eg: here)em are no doubt very poisonous, and many would make an interesting addition to the article. – ClockworkSoul 02:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup

Good copyedit needed. We're not an advice shop... SP-KP 00:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Chromium is excreted

Article says that heavy metals accumulate over time. But this article http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HEC/CSEM/chromium/treatment_management.html says that chromium is cleared from the body quite rapidly. Cphoenix 01:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Various heavy metals have various biological half-lives and thus various cumulative potential. While Cr(VI+) has relatively short half-life, Hg(II+) has half-life of about 70-80 days and is readily accumalated in the organism. Pb(II+), Cd(II+) and R-Hg⁺ have half-lives in order of years, and are strongly cumulative.--Spiperon 21:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Immunity

I was wondering, is it possible to build up an immunity to certain poisons by taking them in small ammounts such as many figures in Ancient History tried to do? 70.48.40.112 05:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

It is tolerance that builds up, not immunity. And it can be done with some but not all poisonous materials. Pzavon 01:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

What poisons -- is there a key or general rule? And, yes, bring in Mithridates, there's a good chap.  ;-) 128.147.28.1 (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Uses of poison : ambiguity

I think that the first sentence of this section is ambiguous. It currently reads: "The uses of poisons specifically because of their toxicity is limited". This can have at least two interpretations:

• Because of their toxicity, the use of poisons is limited.
• Poisons are usually not used for their toxicity, but may be used for their other properties.

There is a third way to parse this sentence (which my brain tried first) which makes no sense. Can anyone clarify this? Rocketmagnet 12:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism (Colbert)

I noticed that this page was vandalized exactly as Colbert ordered (during the Jimmy Wales interview last night) and was left unnoticed for HOURS. Do we need to lock this page? The oxygen, the alpaca and the librarian pages are all currently locked. By the way, is the last line in the first section recently added for the same reason? It seems a little out of context. Leejasonc 17:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Which poison is it ????

I have a question in my mind, is there any poison that if it got mixed with your blood due to some wound or injury, so its harmfull effects can kill you ????

Mohammad Adil 19:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Certainly. The process is called "injection". I see no reason to do into further detail. Pzavon 01:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

If you suspect that you have been exposed to a poison in this way, the recommended answer would be to contact a medical professional. However, if considering a wound, irritation and infection are more probable effects. Few poisons actually diffuse through human tissue to cause fatal effects, but one is unlikely to encounter these except in a chemical plant or laboratory. --Vuo 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Substance vs Chemical Substance

On 3 September 2007 Dave T Hobbit disambiguated the introductory line of this article, which reads "In the context of biology, poisons, or atters are substances that can cause damage, illness, or death to organisms... " He changed the Wikilink for "substance", pointing to chemical substance instead of to the "substance" disambiguation page. I don't believe "chemical substance" is a proper reference here because many poisons are not "pure" chemical substances as defined at that page. Biological toxins, for example, are complex mixtures of chemical substances.

But if chemical substance is an inappropriate link for "substance" in this context, there is not a more suitable article listed at present on the substance disambiguation page.

What can/should be done about this? Pzavon 02:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Any particular biological toxin is a single type of molecule, so it fits with the definition on the chemical substance page. Narayanese 18:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Biological Poisoning is inapprporiate as Section title

As it is currently used in this article, the phrase "Biological Poisoning" is not a good section title in my opinion. The phrase itself seems to me to have little meaning, as all poisiong is biological unless you are talking about the "poisoning of a chemical reaction. And that is not part of the topic of this article. Worse, the text of that section is covering material relevant to all kinds of poisoning. Can anyone suggest a more meaningful section title? Pzavon (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Fork article "Poisoning"?

There is a list of all ICD poisoning classes in the article. This should be under a separate list article, or there should be a different article "Poisoning". Not all poisonings result from GHS/EU/ICSC-classified poisons. --Vuo (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ground glass

While not at all a poison, it is a common myth that ground glass can act like a poison[1]. (See for eg: here)

I don't think the myth is worth an article of its own, but I think it's worth a mention somewhere, but where?. There is an article List of fictional toxins but that's more about toxins in fiction. It could probably be made to fit in this article, but it's not instantly obvious here. Regards, Ben

One option might be Assassination#Techniques, except that that section is so weak at the moment that a discussion of ground glass (a mythical poison) would be out of place. Regards, Ben Aveling 22:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

image, russia

in the image near the bottom, i noticed russia had significantly more poisonings. i googled and found this article: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLS642704 which blames obsolete pesticides among other things. is there any other analysis available? this info seems more russia-related than poison-related, though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.190.96 (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The article linked to the picture also has a different picture although the study seems to be exactly the same, 2004 DALY. Which studies are here getting mixed up? RedJimi (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Toxicology Task Force

Just wanted to announce the creation of a new Toxicology Task Force under WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to come and sign up. Thanks -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Deadliest poison

I was wondering, which poison the most powerful? I read somewhere that botulin is the most powerful natural toxin and that only 450gr could wipe out the human race (in theory). However, I do not now if this is true. I would also like to know which poison(s) kills you the fastest. I got told that cyanide could kill a man before he even has time to fall to the ground, however, I do not know at all if this is true.

Josellis 10:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I doubt the one about cyanide, but I don't really know for sure. The one about botulinum toxin has some truth to it, although it comes of course from a completely idealized calculation (multiplying the population of the Earth by the estimated median lethal dose), which would be impossible in practice. --Itub 10:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe Maitotoxin or Palytoxin, I dunno there may be more poisonous ones. 70.95.142.166 09:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Botulinum toxin A is frequently stated as the most potent (in terms of LD) poison known to date. At least I am not aware of any other poison with lower LD values. As the speed of action is concerned, high concentrations of hydrogen cyanide and nerve agents (Sarin, Tabun, V-agents and such, above their respective LCt₅₀ — LCt₉₀ values), if inhaled, do produce a lethality within about a minute.--109.193.164.130 (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

What to do if preexisting ref seems not to have linkrot but rather webpage was never archived properly?

Specifically, it's in this article. The first ref for the definition; the one linking to Dorland's. If you go there, you'll see that none of the captures for that URL in the Internet Archive show the actual page (they all either show a capture of the site giving you a "page not found" or there just plain isn't anything). — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueFenixReborn (talk • contribs) 06:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Law

I understand that poisons are regulated in most countries similarly to how certain psychotropics are. This may deserve a section of its own in the article. 213.109.230.96 (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Secondary poisoning

There's an article Secondary poisoning that is brief and unreferenced. Should it be merged here? Tony Holkham (Talk) 13:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

The amount makes the poison

I think there needs to be a clarification also that not only certain substances are generally considered poisonous, but that the toxicity of a substance very much depends on its amount, such as salt or salt water, very much needed but in large amount deadly... 193.145.39.154 (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

There is already a mention of this in the "Terminology" section. 72.94.166.193 (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Aware of the adage "The dose makes the poison", I came here to see the exact, possibly legal, definition of poison (because it's just true that everything is a poison). The only sentence about that just says "The law defines "poison" more strictly.", but doesn't clarify. I felt the entire article hence lacks a single definition of poison. Anyone could expand the strict legal definition (even if I guess it may differ depending on the country) ? Thanks!2A01:E35:8BE9:F580:5486:79AB:C68A:755F (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)