Talk:Pogo mine

Alaska Low‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Pogo mine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Alaska may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Moose incident

@Rex65mya:Boldly redirected sub-stub "Pogo Moose Incident" to here primarily on account of no evidence of lasting significance. Also, what I read was so poor, it had no business being in article space; for example, "1.5 meter moose" is highly misleading. 1.5 meters would have been the spread of its antlers while it was rutting. Instead, we're led to believe that this was the overall size of the moose. That would make for one awfully small moose, which contradicts the source's claim that the moose was "massive". As the existing article resembles someone's social media exercise, I expect this inclusion will be challenged, so let's talk about sourcing. The contributed source (Montana Outdoor) looks like a blog to me. The first page of Google hits shows coverage from Snopes, The Economist and the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. As I already mentioned no lasting significance, I suspect these multiple sources are just treading each other's water. Still, it showed that no effort was made to identify quality sources and source material before the entry was thrown into article space. See WP:REFSPAM. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 19:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]