Talk:Poetry in Motion (film)

A fact from Poetry in Motion (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the film Poetry in Motion was described in a review as "orgasmic" for students of contemporary poetry?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poetry in Motion (film).

Wikipedia

Film: Canadian / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Canada: Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

move

It's not clear at all that the film has any reference to the song. Moreover, the film gets all the top google hits, so I put the film back as the first hit. I left Poetry in Motion as a redirect page so it can be discussed/changed without much problem. If anyone can give a more specific reason that the song should be the primary page please discuss. Whisperednumber (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually how about we split the baby. I'm going to create a page about the subway program. Whisperednumber (talk) 12:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, there are songs with the same title.

There are a few songs with the same title as this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.140.218.179 (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

So? Not an issue until there are articles on them, then we can disambig.Whisperednumber 16:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Poetry in motion.jpg

Image:Poetry in motion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something Mann said in an appearance ... has he said it elsewhere?

When I was in college and we showed this film, Mann himself came down from Toronto to talk about it afterwards (we also showed, the next day, Imagine the Sound). I recall one line of his which brought down the house, such as it was:

I was scared to interview Bukowski, because I had read his work.

Somehow I think Bukowski would have liked that. Apparently he had some great unedited footage from the whole conversation ... he joked about releasing it as My Dinner With Bukowski. He also describes Bukowski as the film's "anti-narrator" in that he's really not celebrating the poetry you're seeing read.

Obviously we can't use this in the article as is, but I wonder if Mann might have said something similar elsewhere in a reliable source that we can use. It might make a good addition to the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]