Talk:Poecilobothrus nobilitatus

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KendalTLee. Peer reviewers: Andrewoh29, Olivia.urso, Eengermann.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral Ecology Peer Review Comments

Nicely written article! I made some sentence phrasing revisions, organization changes, and some grammatical/punctuation fixes to make the article read much more smoothly. Additionally, the first sentence in the “Courtship” section: “Poecilobothrus nobilitatus has one of the most complicated courtships studied by researchers” needs a citation, I think. Overall, thank you for your efforts in this article; it was fun to read! andrewoh29 22:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made slight grammatical changes and fixed typos. I also added some hyperlinks and changed the formatting of some in-text citations. Very clear and well-written article though - great work! Eengermann —Preceding undated comment added 00:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great article! Very interesting; especially the sexual dimorphism and the courting behavior. I changed a few sentences to improve clarity and reduce redundancy. One suggestion would be to improve the courtship section as it was slightly confusing to a lay-person who doesn't know a lot about this particular fly. Overall, great article; enjoyed the read! Olivia.urso (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this article was really interesting as it contains a thorough and clear explanation of a well-studied behavior! I made a few minor edits for clarity, but my main suggestion to make it good article worthy is a discussion of the implications of this well-studied mating behavior! Really enjoyed the read, and its clearly been improved even since last time I read through it! Great job! Olivia.urso (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the Range heading to the top of the page to match the style of starting with Distribution information. Wondering if there's a citation that goes along with the countries listed? XuLily (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]