Talk:Poco (band)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Poco (band) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

I distinctly remember "Call It Love" being a big hit in 1984 -- long before it appeared on the Legacy album...

Personnel changes

I don't really know this band, so could someone familiar with them do a personnel chart, like this one. 75pickup (talk · contribs) 75pickup 02:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done AyaK (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Frame's book the Complete Rock and Roll Family Tree shows Poco emerging from the break up of the Buffalo Springfield and shows connections to the Byrds, the Eagles and various others. As far as Eagles members that have been in Poco, that subject is covered in this article but for brevity's sake, Randy Meisner and Timothy B Schmidt are both former Poco members.Devildave (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POCO

What does POCO mean? Is there a translation? What is the meaning of Poco? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.113.206 (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a musical term meaning to diminish to a "small measure"Devildave (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Hi all. I've suggested that List of Poco Line-ups be merged into this article as it is insufficiently contextualised to stand on its own, and doesn't possess enough encyclopedic content to stand on its own. Cheers. [ roux ] [x] 01:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It should be included. It was previously. Myself and several others have a fair amount of time invested in that list.Devildave (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Figure

What's up with the timeline figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.235.169 (talk) 19:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poco → Poco (band)
Poco (disambiguation) → Poco

– No primary topic. Two topics with this name get basically equal pageviews and neither makes an impression on Google Scholar or Books, suggesting neither has a claim to long-term primary significance. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and a book search produces numerous references to a name and to the expression in music unrelated to the band, so it would seem to make sense to disambiguate because it doesn't seem likely that the average reader associates the term so strongly with the band to overshadow all this ambiguity. https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Poco indicates a significant amount of organic interest in the band (~17k views/month) so comparing the numbers for the hatnote with that won't really be useful. --Joy (talk) 14:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.