Talk:Pocket Ref
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Reads like an ad in a magazine... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.92.149 (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Agreed. Is this just a USA book? The article content suggests it's available everywhere, but I've never seen it anywhere. I note that this was previously nominated for deletion. Perhaps it could be rolled into the 'Handbook' entry as one example of a general handbook. There are quite a few others, historically speaking, and it seems unencyclopedic to only feature this one, and to do it at such length.Martin Turner (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2018 (UTC)