Talk:Plum cake/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a few modifications made according to the points outlined in "Comments", below, the article is now grammatically and textually sound, as well as properly structured and organized. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article is well-referenced, with a healthy bibliography of reliable sources. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

Taking into account a note made by the nominator about the article's coverage, the article does appear to sufficiently cover all relevant aspects of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

No traces of bias in the article's tone. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

It looks as though the article has never been subject to disruptive editing, since the time of its creation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All images used in the article are validly licensed, and make for relevant illustrative examples. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Comments

In the "History" section, it mentions: In Old English, the term plūme was "from medieval Latin pruna, from Latin prunum, which equated to prune, followed by a citation. Where is the segment with quotation marks, beginning at "from medieval...", supposed to end?

I have corrected this in the article, adding the endquote and also italicization, per the source (diff, diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also in that section, two passages read as, respectively, "the term plum cake still typically refers..." and "the term plum originally referred..." Odds are this boils down to nitpicking on my part, but I really think it's better to have "plum cake" and "plum", when referred to as terms, put in quotes - either singular or double - to emphasize that it's the word or phrase being discussed in that sentence, and not the object it refers to. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quote marks have been added to denote terms in the article (diff, diff). Thanks for the suggestions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome. I also took care of the complaints of an IP concerning clarification. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article is now good to go. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Note that when working on this article, I used almost all of the reliable sources available online. The topic has received significant coverage, but many sources only provide mentions, etc. I mention this because while the article may seem short at parts, it's based upon most of the available reliable sources about the topic. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]