Talk:Plug In Baby

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Second Paragraph

Mere speculation, if anyone can find some references for the claims that's fine, otherwise the paragraph should be deleted. mode_seven 17:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is Matt Bellamy really addicted to porn?

I don't think so. It's just speculation, maybe one should delete it. --Nr. 213-140-22-64 17:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as nothing's happened over the last five months, I'm going to remove it. Mark ^(Talk) 16:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Due to the ongoing disputes about which genre Muse's music falls into I think it'd be safest just to describe them as a "rock band", as that can hardly be challenged. 81.23.56.53 (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the alteration. Pretty sure it should be okay. Can always be reverted if not. I just struggle to think of PiB as a "prog" song. 81.23.56.53 (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus. Meanwhile, try to figure out what the grammatical intent of "in" is in the song title. @harej 13:47, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plug In Baby → Plug in Baby — caps —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalizing "in" likely depends on detailed examination of the song's lyrics to find whether the "in" is a preposition ("plug into the baby") or an adverb ("a baby which is plugged in"). Pop music songs are about strange topics sometimes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from my user talk page (Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)):-[reply]
- Per this Here are the lyrics. I guess you can move or close the discussion based on that. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
From the lyrics it looks like that "plug in baby" should be "plug-in baby" and the "in" is an adverb: the lyrics as printed are inadequately punctuated: for example the first line "I've exposed your lies baby" should be "I've exposed your lies, baby." with a comma before the vocative, and a fullstop. (And, in pop music songs "baby" often means not "infant" but "my girlfriend".) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Plug In Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=137
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noisecreep.com/2011/06/07/lovedrug-cover-def-leppard-hysteria/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110829052825/http://iamlovedrug.com/ to http://www.iamlovedrug.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]