Talk:Plotnikovia

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Animals

Plotnikovia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Is it a grasshopper or a worm?

Thank you @William Avery: and @Plantdrew: for your edits - this is a difficult one, with Wikidata and the international databases all over the place (try the links to NL and Sv:WP!). I don't think we should write a taxobox yet and thought that the 2 taxonbars (computer didn't let me do a from2) illustrated the issue. I think we will just have to await a decision: I would put my money on the grasshopper, based on dates and have retained the Category, but I am just a biassed entomologist! Brgds.Roy Bateman (talk) 07:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming they are both validly published, Plotnikovia Umnov, 1930 would appear to have priority over Plotnikovia Skrjabin, 1945. Until a replacement name is decided for one or the other and published in secondary sources, we would just have to use normal Wikipedia disambiguation in some way. The beetle genus name Aethes L.A.A.Chevrolat, 1883 (See GBIF) is still in use despite the existence of the moth genus Aethes Billberg, 1820, (also in GBIF). William Avery (talk) 12:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - but I see that GBIF has Aethes L.A.A.Chevrolat, 1883 as "Doubtful". Roy Bateman (talk) 04:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolatia being preoccupied, it was drily replaced with the hemihomonym Billbergia Blackwelder, 1947. See IMRNG. William Avery (talk) 11:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]