Talk:Players (2012 film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Secret of success (talk · contribs) 10:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
As of this version :
- General
- References not formatted properly. They require these six fields : Title, url, publisher, author, date and accessdate. Also, the date and accessdate need to be uniformly set up. Newspapers, news channels and magazines need to be italicized.
- List of unreliable sources : 12, 16, 26, 34, 36, 44, 52, 54, 58, 61, 63, 65, 69, 71, 74, 90, 92, 94, 97, 98, 101, 103, 105, 107, 108, 112, 120, 122, 123, 157, 164, 174 and 176. Basically the two sites "Bollyspice" and "Glamsham". They need to be replaced.
- Poster in the infobox requires an ALT text.
- A copy-edit would undoubtedly raise the article, by a significant difference.
- Unwanted references exist everywhere,
for instance, in the first sentence of the article i. e. The Mid-DAY report clarifies the statement, hence the other two can be removed.
- Lead
The first sentence requires the Indic script to be removed, per consensus at WT:IN.- "an all star ensemble cast" - What is "all star"?
"gold worth 100 thousand crores" - Currency? Symbol?- "double crossed by some of their own team members." - POV
- I have done up all the currency and other parts of the article. However, as an editor who has very limited contribution to this article, I would like to point out that the text of the article requires a good deal of clean-up; the prose in several areas sounds poorly written. I hope the nominator can look into that. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I hope so too. I've listed it in WP:GOCE to get it copy-edited and plan to hold the GA review for 30 days, because there seems to be no major contributor to this page. Secret of success (talk) 04:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have done up all the currency and other parts of the article. However, as an editor who has very limited contribution to this article, I would like to point out that the text of the article requires a good deal of clean-up; the prose in several areas sounds poorly written. I hope the nominator can look into that. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
As there has been a very little amount of response to the article, it should be noted that I plan to finish the review within 30 days, and unless someone turns up, I shall be forced to fail the article. Secret of success 08:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I think there is some issue with the twitter link. Ayanosh (talk) 08:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
As little response has been shown to this GA, I am failing it for now. This article has several problems, mainly with the prose and the sources. I would suggest that the above problems be fixed, and the article can be renominated after that. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)