Talk:Plaxton Premiere
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which coach is this article even about?
[edit]Having recently procured an issue of CBW that goes in depth about the Plaxton Prima, I'm quite surprised to see that every single image (including in the infobox! Surely that should be a Premiere instead?) is one of a Prima, yet the type is rarely mentioned in the article body when compared to the Premiere.
By my count:
- The Prima is mentioned nine times, three of which are in substantial article body despite the heavy use of Prima images,
- The Premiere is mentioned 25 times, however there are no images of it, and
- The Excalibur is mentioned twelve times with no demonstration of the 'more dramatically styled front end'.
- And then there's the references to '320' and '350' models, i.e. 'Most of the Scanias were the low 320 model'; surely that's not a very clear sentence even with context.
I feel this article is very liable to confusion and desperately needs a rewrite along with the addition of sources. However, I'm personally not sure where I'd even begin, given the possibility for confusion above. Hullian111 (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)